On the Columbia Middle for Modern Important Thought Marx 9/13 session on the Grundrisse final night time, I requested a query from Zoom that can’t be heard on the Youtube video due to technical difficulties. I’ll attempt to reconstruct the jist of the query right here together with a little bit of context. I apologize if the reconstruction of my query is a little more coherent than the unique, which was made unintelligable by a time delay and obvious distractions within the viewers.
In his presentation, Michael Hardt spoke in regards to the Italian Autonomists’ “refusal of labor” technique that Antonio Negri articulated in his ebook, Marx Past Marx. In speaking about how the technique associated to the Grundrisse, Hardt referred to a parenthetical passage the place Marx talked about “the employee’s participation within the increased, even cultural satisfactions…”:
…the agitation for his personal pursuits, newspaper subscriptions, attending lectures, educating his youngsters, creating his style and so forth., his solely share of civilization which distinguishes him from the slave, is economically solely doable by widening the sphere of his pleasures on the instances when enterprise is sweet, the place saving is to a sure diploma doable.
On the subject of that refusal of labor and widening the sphere of enjoyment, I requested Hardt about Marx’s dialogue of disposable time and his outstanding sentence that “[t]he entire growth of wealth rests on the creation of disposable time.” I identified that Marx had cited the 1821 pamphlet, The Supply and Treatment of the Nationwide Difficulties, on disposable time instantly earlier than presenting his personal assertion and that William Godwin, who influenced the writer of the pamphlet (Dilke), wrote one thing similar to Marx’s widening the sphere of enjoyment:
These hours which aren’t required for the manufacturing of the necessaries of life, could also be dedicated to the cultivation of the understanding, the enlarging our inventory of information, the refining our style, and thus opening to us new and extra beautiful sources of enjoyment.
Given these affinities, I requested if Hardt had given any thought to how a studying of the 1821 pamphlet and of Godwin’s writings on leisure for all would possibly illuminate Marx’s thought on these subjects.
Here’s a clip of Michael Hardt’s reply: