When you file your tax return late, you’ll typically solely face a penalty if there’s an quantity owing in your return. However, should you occur to personal sure overseas property , you could be hit with a late-filing penalty from the Canada Income Company for merely failing to file Type T1135 , the International Earnings Verification Assertion, on time.
This kind is required should you personal “specified overseas property” the place the whole price quantity of all such property, at any time within the 12 months, was greater than $100,000. International property consists of such property as a U.S. checking account, in addition to shares of overseas companies if held in a non-registered account. Private use property, resembling a Miami trip condominium, is excluded, as are any property held in registered accounts.
The penalty for failing to file the shape on time is $25 per day, to a most of $2,500, plus arrears curiosity. When you’re assessed a penalty, you may write to the CRA requesting reduction when occasions “past your management” forestall you from submitting on time. If the CRA denies your request for reduction, you may then take the matter to federal courtroom the place a decide will resolve whether or not the CRA officer’s determination to disclaim reduction was affordable.
A July 2026 federal courtroom determination handled a pair who confronted penalties for failing to file their 2021 T1135s on time. They claimed the delay was the results of their reliance “on deceptive and incomplete info from the CRA.”
The taxpayer owns business property within the U.S. via varied restricted legal responsibility partnerships from which he earns rental earnings. His spouse additionally has investments within the U.S.
In 2020, the taxpayer offered considered one of his properties, which resulted in a capital achieve. Whereas making ready his 2020 tax return, his accountant calculated the capital achieve on the sale, however the taxpayer believed the estimate was “considerably inflated.” To keep away from penalties and curiosity for late-filing their returns, the taxpayer and his partner nonetheless filed their 2020 earnings tax returns primarily based on the upper determine, counting on the accountant’s assurance that they might regulate their 2020 returns later to replicate the right capital achieve.
And, in April 2022, that’s precisely what the taxpayer did, submitting a T1 Adjustment Request for the 2020 tax 12 months that lowered his capital achieve. Consequently, this allowed the taxpayer to decrease his 2020 RRSP deduction, thereby liberating up unused RRSP contribution room to hold ahead and deduct in 2021.
Later that month, the taxpayer reached out to the CRA to test the standing of his 2020 adjustment. As his 2020 reassessment was nonetheless pending, he was suggested by a CRA agent merely to submit his 2021 tax return on time with out claiming the newly freed-up RRSP carryforward room, which might not but be mirrored within the CRA’s techniques. He was then instructed that after he acquired each the 2020 and 2021 notices of (re)evaluation, he may file a brand new adjustment request for the 2021 tax 12 months, amending his RRSP deduction declare.
Hoping to keep away from submitting one other adjustment request for 2021, the taxpayer determined that he would as an alternative look forward to his 2020 reassessment, and easily file the couple’s 2021 returns late. He reached out to the CRA and requested concerning the penalties of late-filing, and was instructed by a CRA agent that “penalties are charged should you file your return late and have a stability owing.”
Consequently, the April 30, 2022, tax submitting deadline got here and went, and the taxpayer hadn’t but filed his or his spouse’s 2021 returns. April 30 was additionally the deadline for submitting their T1135 varieties to report possession of overseas property.
In July 2022 the taxpayer acquired his 2020 discover of reassessment and in mid-December 2022, almost eight months after the April 30 deadline, the taxpayer and his spouse filed their 2021 returns, together with their T1135 varieties. Neither owed taxes for 2021 and each acquired refunds.
In January 2023, the CRA issued notices of evaluation for the 2021 tax 12 months, and assessed a penalty of $2,500 to every of them, plus arrears curiosity, for late-filing their T1135s.
The taxpayer wrote to the CRA asking for penalty reduction, however was denied. He requested a second-level assessment, noting that he had particularly requested the CRA about late-filing penalties and “was assured that until I owe tax, there could be no penalty.” He asserted that “the CRA web site and the Federal Earnings Tax and Profit Information are deceiving” as a result of the Penalties part solely states that CRA might cost a penalty should you “1) file your return late and owe tax, 2) didn’t report an quantity, or 3) made a false assertion or omission.” None of those causes utilized to his state of affairs.
He additional argued that the truth that a selected type can have its personal separate penalty is “not ‘normal information’ however relatively particular information.” He concluded that the “CRA has made it just about unimaginable to turn out to be conscious of that reality until you already know that particular varieties might incur a penalty and particularly lookup the shape.”
In July 2024, the second-level CRA agent denied the taxpayer’s request for reduction. Because the agent wrote, “Oversight, lack of information, or unintentional error aren’t thought of circumstances past a taxpayer’s management.”
The taxpayer determined to take the matter to courtroom, searching for a judicial assessment by a federal courtroom decide, whose function it’s to find out whether or not the CRA officer’s determination to not grant reduction was affordable.
The taxpayer relied on two foremost arguments: that he was misled by the data acquired from a CRA agent and that the data accessible on the CRA web site made it “just about unimaginable” to know if there was a selected penalty for the late submitting of Type T1135.
In courtroom, the taxpayer acknowledged that in his cellphone name with the CRA about penalties, he didn’t point out type T1135 and solely requested if there could be a penalty if he waited for the results of his 2020 T1 adjustment request and filed his 2021 tax return late in order to make use of the right RRSP deduction quantity.
As for the taxpayer’s declare that the T1135 penalty info was not “available” on the CRA’s web site, the taxpayer was alluding to the truth that he would have needed to click on via a number of hyperlinks to seek out the related info.
The decide discovered the taxpayer’s arguments unpersuasive and concluded that the CRA officer’s determination to not grant reduction was, certainly, affordable, dismissing the taxpayer’s case.
Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Non-public Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com .
When you preferred this story, join extra within the FP Investor e-newsletter.